This page was generated by nbsphinx from docs/notebooks/formulary/coulomb.ipynb.
Interactive online version: Binder badge.

Coulomb logarithms

Coulomb collisions are collisions between two charged particles where the interaction is governed solely by the electric fields from the two particles. Coulomb collisions usually result in small deflections of particle trajectories. The deflection angle depends on the impact parameter of the collision, which is the perpendicular distance between the particle’s trajectory and the particle it is colliding with. High impact parameter collisions (which result in small deflection angles) occur much more frequently than low impact parameter collisions (which result in large deflection angles).


The minimum and maximum impact parameters (\(b_\min\) and \(b_\max\), respectively) represent the range of distances of closest approach. While a typical Coulomb collision results in only a slight change in trajectory, the effects of these collisions are cumulative, and it is necessary to integrate over the range of impact parameters to account for the effects of Coulomb collisions throughout the plasma. The Coulomb logarithm accounts for the range in impact parameters for the different collisions, and is given by

\[\ln{Λ} ≡ \ln\left(\frac{b_\max}{b_\min}\right).\]

But what should we use for the impact parameters?

Usually \(b_\max\) is given by the Debye length, \(λ_D\), which can be calculated with Debye_length. On length scales \(≳ λ_D\), electric fields from individual particles get cancelled out due to screening effects. Consequently, Coulomb collisions with impact parameters \(≳ λ_D\) will rarely occur.

The inner impact parameter \(b_\min\) requires more nuance. One possibility would be to set \(b_\min\) to be the impact parameter corresponding to a 90° deflection angle, \(ρ_⟂\), which can be calculated with impact_parameter_perp. Alternatively, \(b_\min\) could be set to be the de Broglie wavelength, \(λ_{dB}\), calculated using the reduced mass, \(μ\), of the particles. Typically,

\[b_\min = \max\left\{ρ_⟂, λ_{dB} \right\}.\]

The impact_parameter function in plasmapy.formulary simultaneously calculates both \(b_\min\) and \(b_\max\). Let’s estimate \(b_\min\) and \(b_\max\) for proton-electron collisions in the solar corona.

%matplotlib inline
%config InlineBackend.figure_formats = ['svg']

import astropy.units as u
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np

from astropy.visualization import quantity_support

from plasmapy.formulary import (
from plasmapy.particles import reduced_mass
solar_corona = {
    "T": 1e6 * u.K,
    "n_e": 1e15 * u.m**-3,
    "species": ["e-", "p+"],

bmin, bmax = impact_parameter(**solar_corona)

print(f"{bmin = :.2e}")
print(f"{bmax = :.2e}")
bmin = 1.05e-11 m
bmax = 2.18e-03 m

When we can calculate the Coulomb logarithm, we find that it is ∼20 (a common value for astrophysical plasma).


Our next goals are visualize the Coulomb logarithm and impact parameters for different physical conditions. Let’s start by creating a function to plot \(\ln{Λ}\) against temperature. We will use quantity_support to enable plotting with Quantity objects.

def plot_coulomb(T, n_e, species, **kwargs):
    """Plot the Coulomb logarithm and impact parameter length scales."""

    ln_Λ = Coulomb_logarithm(T, n_e, species, **kwargs)

    with quantity_support():

        fig, ax = plt.subplots()

        fig.set_size_inches(4, 4)

        ax.semilogx(T, ln_Λ)
        ax.set_xlabel("T (K)")
        ax.set_title("Coulomb logarithm")


Next we will create a function to plot \(b_\min\) and \(b_\max\) as functions of temperature, along with the \(ρ_⟂\) and \(λ_{dB}\).

from astropy.constants import hbar as 

def plot_impact_parameters(T, n_e, species, **kwargs):
    """Plot the minimum & maximum impact parameters for Coulomb collisions."""

    bmin, bmax = impact_parameter(T, n_e, species, **kwargs)

    μ = reduced_mass(*species)
    V_the = thermal_speed(T, "e-")
    λ_dB =  / (2 * μ * V_the)

    ρ_perp = impact_parameter_perp(T, species)

    with quantity_support():
        fig, ax = plt.subplots()
        fig.set_size_inches(4, 4)

        ax.loglog(T, λ_dB, "--", label="$λ_\mathrm{dB}$")
        ax.loglog(T, ρ_perp, "-.", label="$ρ_\perp$")
        ax.loglog(T, bmin, "-", label="$b_\mathrm{min}$")
        ax.loglog(T, bmax, "-", label="$b_\mathrm{max}$")

        ax.set_xlabel("T (K)")
        ax.set_ylabel("b (m)")
        ax.set_title("Impact parameters")


Let’s now plot the Coulomb logarithm and minimum/maximum impact parameters over a range of temperatures in a dense plasma.

n_e = 1e25 * u.m**-3

dense_plasma = {
    "T": np.geomspace(1e5, 2e6) * u.K,
    "n_e": n_e,
    "species": ["e-", "p+"],


To investigate what is happening at the sudden change in slope, let’s plot the impact parameters against temperature.


At low temperatures, \(b_\min\) is \(ρ_⟂\). At higher temperatures, \(b_\min\) is \(λ_{dB}\). What happens if we look at lower temperatures?

cool_dense_plasma = {
    "T": np.geomspace(1e2, 2e4) * u.K,
    "n_e": n_e,
    "species": ["e-", "p+"],

/home/docs/checkouts/ CouplingWarning: The Coulomb logarithm is [-5.947677   -5.78548361 -5.62329023 -5.46109684 -5.29890345 -5.13671006
 -4.97451667 -4.81232328 -4.65012989 -4.4879365  -4.32574312 -4.16354973
 -4.00135634 -3.83916295 -3.67696956 -3.51477617 -3.35258278 -3.19038939
 -3.02819601 -2.86600262 -2.70380923 -2.54161584 -2.37942245 -2.21722906
 -2.05503567 -1.89284228 -1.7306489  -1.56845551 -1.40626212 -1.24406873
 -1.08187534 -0.91968195 -0.75748856 -0.59529517 -0.43310179 -0.2709084
 -0.10871501  0.05347838  0.21567177  0.37786516  0.54005855  0.70225194
  0.86444533  1.02663871  1.1888321   1.35102549  1.51321888  1.67541227
  1.83760566  1.99979905], and the specified method, "classical", depends on weak coupling.

The Coulomb logarithm becomes negative! 🙀 Let’s look at the impact parameters again to understand what’s happening.


This unphysical situation occurs because \(b_\min > b_\max\) at low temperatures.

So how should we handle this? Fortunately, PlasmaPy’s implementation of Coulomb_logarithm includes the methods described by Gericke, Murillo, and Schlanges (2002) for dense, strongly-coupled plasmas. For most cases, we recommend using method="hls_full_interp" in which \(b_\min\) is interpolated between \(λ_{dB}\) and \(ρ_⟂\), and \(b_\max\) is interpolated between \(λ_D\) and the ion sphere radius, \(a_i ≡ \left(\frac{3}{4} π n_i\right)^{⅓}\).

cool_dense_plasma["z_mean"] = 1
cool_dense_plasma["method"] = "hls_full_interp"

/home/docs/checkouts/ CouplingWarning: The Coulomb logarithm is [5.96814188e-04 7.41261191e-04 9.20702661e-04 1.14362429e-03
 1.42056952e-03 1.76463707e-03 2.19209724e-03 2.72315447e-03
 3.38288916e-03 4.20241824e-03 5.22032094e-03 6.48438372e-03
 8.05372479e-03 1.00013638e-02 1.24173032e-02 1.54121820e-02
 1.91215422e-02 2.37107122e-02 2.93802420e-02 3.63717175e-02
 4.49736182e-02 5.55266607e-02 6.84277829e-02 8.41316051e-02
 1.03147904e-01 1.26033478e-01 1.53376916e-01 1.85775413e-01
 2.23803975e-01 2.67979145e-01 3.18721309e-01 3.76321149e-01
 4.40916114e-01 5.12481465e-01 5.90837662e-01 6.75672508e-01
 7.66573605e-01 8.63065263e-01 9.64644246e-01 1.07081017e+00
 1.18108833e+00 1.29504450e+00 1.41229255e+00 1.53249637e+00
 1.65536775e+00 1.78066168e+00 1.90817037e+00 2.03771678e+00
 2.16914841e+00 2.30233151e+00], so strong coupling effects may exist for the plasma.

The Coulomb logarithm approaches zero as the temperature decreases, and does not become unphysically negative. This is the expected behavior, although there is increased uncertainty for Coulomb logarithms \(≲4\).